Skip to content

docs: add GitHub-only sponsor acknowledgements - #38

Draft
Terastar-Paperclip wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
funding/qua-60-github-acknowledgements
Draft

Terastar-Paperclip wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
funding/qua-60-github-acknowledgements

Conversation

@Terastar-Paperclip

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

QuantCLI’s GitHub Sponsors profile is live, and the four funding-file PRs are already merged. This adds the canonical GitHub-only acknowledgement page, with one alphabetical roster across tiers, tier names only, no logos or tier-sized placement, and an aggregate Anonymous (N) for sponsors who decline public acknowledgement. The sponsor-influence firewall explicitly excludes governance, roadmap priority, contract concessions, exclusivity, and support SLAs.

The handoff includes no verified sponsor roster or acknowledgement preferences. The page therefore states that reconciliation is pending; it makes no claim of zero sponsors and publishes no names or anonymous count. Executive Director approval is required before merge. Adding the verified roster remains part of QUA-60.

Budget verification: common #26 was closed unmerged on July 23, 2026, and BUDGET.md is absent from current main. This PR does not restore that rejected proposal. The first reconciliation template and source checklist are held on QUA-60 for review; the first post-launch snapshot is due in December 2026, using primary GitHub Sponsors records. No Open Collective ledger or account is expected.

Validation: based on current main (1e9a61b); staged diff whitespace check passed; reviewed that the change is limited to SPONSORS.md, uses GitHub only, contains no financial figures or personal sponsor data, and does not alter funding files, code, schema, or compat. No runtime tests apply to this Markdown-only draft.

Publication gate: keep this PR in draft until Executive Director review, then follow the established board approval and merge process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants